Talk To Other Humans
“A problem well-put is half-solved.”
—John Dewey
Design thinking isn’t just an exceptional problem solving methodology. It’s first and foremost a problem finding methodology.
And how do we find problems worth solving? Simply, we talk to other humans.
Talking to others is a fantastic way to combat apathy, one of the great enemies of creativity and innovation. Cultivating empathy for the people for whom we are designing drives passion and care.
Teams that care are much more likely to overcome the inevitable obstacles that are strewn across the path to innovation. They’re the teams that say, “This must be solved.”
Looking for tips on how to empathize? Talking to people is a skill that rewards folks far beyond journalists and best-selling authors.
Focus on emotions. Tactical and logistical data is much less interesting. Insights are fuel by emotion.
Get specific. Folks are comfortable speaking in generalities, but you’ll never learn anything interesting asking about “usually…”
Ask “why?” often. Assume you don’t understand their motives… because you don’t.
For more, check out design leader Bill Pacheco’s post.
Related: Be Obsessed
Related: Drive Innovation Through Care
Related: To Empathize, Allow Some Space
Join over 10,447 creators & leaders who read Paint & Pipette each week
My new favorite diagnostic: if you cannot find ways to generate more than $200 of value from frontier AI over the course of an entire month, you're failing a basic creativity test.
This isn't about AI's limitations—it's about yours.
“Think:Act Magazine” was curious about how I incorporate AI into my own creative process as a writer, so they visited my home studio to observe my workflow. What followed was a fascinating exploration of how I use multiple LLMs as collaborative partners rather than just tools. Fun to be featured alongside heroes of innovation like Astro Teller, Amy Edmondson, and the legendary design duo Charles and Ray Eames!
A recent study by American Management Association revealed that 58% of professionals feel "behind" in their AI adoption journey. While most folks know me as "the Beyond the Prompt guy," here's what you might not know: I struggle with this stuff too.
Last week, I proposed a simple but fundamental shift: we need to stop thinking about AI as a technology rollout and start treating it like a new teammate. What I didn't fully explain is that this isn't just a semantic distinction. It produces measurably better results.
I’ve been seriously thinking about AI for over two years now, and I’m finally hitting my stride when it comes to my point of view. The fundamental shift I believe everyone must make is from thinking of AI as a technology, to thinking of AI as a teammate.
Still waiting on other people before you tap AI? Big mistake. This post exposes the silent tax of “AI inaction,” hands you the five‑rung ladder for turning any model into your on‑call mentor, and launches a seven‑day sprint that will hard‑wire the habit—so you can seize the advantage while everyone else is still scheduling meetings.
Last week, Shopify CEO Tobi Lütke released an internal memo that's been making waves. My take: this isn't just another tech CEO jumping on the AI bandwagon. It's the clearest articulation I've seen of a principle I've been exploring the past 18 months: the greatest risk with AI isn't failure—it's inaction.
I'm best known for my work on innovation, creativity, and entrepreneurship. My “shift” toward AI might seem like a radical departure. But it's not a shift—it's an evolution. Having taught and spoken to tens of thousands from ~100 countries in the last two years, I’m more convinced than ever that AI isn't separate from innovation; it's the most profound innovation platform of our lifetime.
AI isn't coming for your job. But someone using AI almost certainly is. So why not take your own job before someone else does? It’s time to prioritize and systematize disrupting ourselves.
I thought I was running a standard innovation workshop with one of my favorite clients. Instead, I came to face to face with my own biases, and accidentally broke an entire organization's understanding of what's possible.